THE SUFFERING CHURCH: and the sin of selective sympathy
1 Corinthians 12:25-26 so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.
Once a quiet, deeply rooted Christian community, the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon stood as a living tapestry of heritage, Christian faith, and ordinary life. Often called “the little Switzerland of Lebanon,” its stone houses, churches, and winding lanes held generations of memory. Today, images of devastation have stirred grief and anger across communities after Israeli military operations completely destroyed the village and the deep-rooted Christian witness it carried
Destruction on this scale forces the global Church to confront her own biases by answering a difficult question:
When suffering comes from the hands of our allies, is our compassion as consistent as when it comes from the hands of our enemies?
In the end, beyond accusations and counter‑accusations, one truth stands firm: Christian suffering should never be filtered through selective lenses.
Picture from a Facebook post by Raza Samo
For fifty years I have served the persecuted Church across the globe. My calling has taken me to every continent on earth, where I have had the sacred privilege of weeping with those who weep and learning from those who carry the cross of Christ in places of deep suffering. My lifelong consecration has been twofold: committed to standing in solidarity with believers in chains and advocating their cause to the Church in freedom.
Yet across these five decades, one of the most painful truths I have encountered is this: the compassion of the Church in freedom is not always consistent. We raise our voices boldly when persecuted Christians suffer at the hands of those we already view as enemies, but we grow noticeably quiet when persecuted Christians suffer at the hands of those we consider friends.
When we speak passionately about Christians in Iran suffering under an oppressive Islamic regime — especially when their suffering reinforces narratives of a war we already support — our advocacy can unintentionally weaponize their persecution. Yet, when we remain silent about Christian suffering in places like southern Lebanon, the West Bank or Gaza, where the pain is linked to Israel, a nation many believers cherish, our silence can unintentionally diminish the weight of that suffering.
My concern is not to assign blame, but to expose a pattern: when our compassion follows our alliances, it ceases to be the compassion of Christ. The persecuted Church deserves better than selective solidarity. And the world deserves a witness that is shaped not by political loyalties, but by the cross.
This is not a political problem. It is a discipleship problem. And here are the reasons why
-
WE ARE BOLD WHEN THE PERSECUTOR FITS OUR NARRATIVE
When Christians in Iran are arrested, or when believers in China are monitored, imprisoned, or silenced, many churches in the West respond with passion. Prayer chains form. Advocacy campaigns launch. Voices rise. And rightly so — these brothers and sisters deserve our solidarity.
But our boldness often has a pattern: we speak strongly when the persecutor is someone we already distrust. We solidify an enemy image of the persecutor instead of creating compassion for the persecuted.
Their suffering confirms our worldview, so we amplify it.
But…
-
WE ARE QUIET WHEN THE PERSECUTOR IS SOMEONE WE SUPPORT
But what happens when Christians suffer at the hands of those we consider allies — politically, culturally, or theologically?
What happens when Christian villages in southern Lebanon or southern Gaza are completely destroyed at the hands of the Israel Defence Force? What happens when believers in the West Bank lose homes, land, or family members because of violent actions by Jewish settlers? What happens when Christian communities in conflict zones are caught in the crossfire of nations we admire or defend?
Suddenly the room grows quiet. We begin to rationalize suffering, explaining away trauma as collateral damage caused by other forces at play. Yes, we know the Church in Gaza is being destroyed by Israeli forces and that Christians there are enduring suffering beyond words — but we tell ourselves it is because of Hamas. And in Lebanon, we say it is because of Hezbollah. A silence settles over us. Not because the suffering is less. Not because the victims are less Christian. But because the story is less convenient.
This is the sin of selective sympathy – the moment when loyalty to the perpetrator speaks louder than concern for the victim.
-
THE EARLY CHURCH REFUSED SELECTIVE COMPASSION
In the book of Acts, persecution came from religious leaders, political authorities, local mobs, foreign powers, and even fellow believers.
Yet the church never filtered its compassion through alliances. They did not ask, “Who is persecuting them?” They asked, “Who is suffering?”
Their solidarity was shaped by Christ, not by geopolitics. By the victim, never by the perpetrator
-
SELECTIVE CONCERN REVEALS OUR BLIND SPOTS
When we only speak for persecuted Christians in certain countries, or only when the oppressor fits our preferred narrative, we reveal something about ourselves: We reveal that our compassion is conditional, our outrage is tribal and our advocacy is political before it is biblical
And the world notices. And it weakens our witness.
-
THE CALL OF CHRIST IS CONSISTENT COMPASSION
Jesus never said, “Love your neighbour when it is politically convenient.” He never said, “Stand with the suffering when it fits your side’s story.” He said, “Whatever you did to the least of these, you did to Me.”
The persecuted church does not need our selective outrage. They need our consistent presence.
Whether they suffer under regimes we oppose or under governments we support, their pain is the same and their dignity is the same. Standing with the suffering Church in Gaza is not an act of hostility towards Israel — it is simply an act of faithfulness toward the Body of Christ.
-
A CHURCH WITHOUT BORDERS IN ITS COMPASSION
A mature church does not ask, “Is this my ally or my enemy?” but rather, “Is this my brother or my sister?”
A Spirit‑filled church refuses to let political loyalties determine its moral clarity. A Christ‑shaped church speaks with one voice for all who suffer, not only those whose stories strengthen our arguments.
IN THE END
Selective concern is a temptation for every generation of believers. But the Spirit keeps calling us back to a deeper truth:
If our compassion has borders, our discipleship has cracks. If our outrage is selective, our witness is compromised. If our solidarity depends on who the persecutor is, then it is not Christ we are following — but our tribe.
The persecuted church deserves better. Christ deserves better. And by His Spirit, we can become better.